<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How much solar energy (kJ) would have to be transferred to a 154.0 foot length of asphalt highway that is?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hwy1guide.com/2006/01/03/how-much-solar-energy-kj-would-have-to-be-transferred-to-a-154-0-foot-length-of-asphalt-highway-that-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hwy1guide.com/2006/01/03/how-much-solar-energy-kj-would-have-to-be-transferred-to-a-154-0-foot-length-of-asphalt-highway-that-is/</link>
	<description>Highway 1 Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: genericman1998</title>
		<link>http://www.hwy1guide.com/2006/01/03/how-much-solar-energy-kj-would-have-to-be-transferred-to-a-154-0-foot-length-of-asphalt-highway-that-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>genericman1998</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 08:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hwy1guide.com/2006/01/03/how-much-solar-energy-kj-would-have-to-be-transferred-to-a-154-0-foot-length-of-asphalt-highway-that-is/#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://kansieo.com&quot;&gt;Create a video blog...instantly.&lt;/a&gt;


Just as a guess, perhaps you calculated the volume incorrectly, or did the conversion to cubic meters incorrectly.  The rest is pretty straightforward, just multiplying by the given numbers with no further unit conversions necessary.  

But you must get the volume in cubic meters first.  It&#039;s a pretty large number, between 50,000 and 100,000 m^3 (assuming I calculated it correctly ...)

Hope this helps a little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kansieo.com">Create a video blog&#8230;instantly.</a></p>
<p>Just as a guess, perhaps you calculated the volume incorrectly, or did the conversion to cubic meters incorrectly.  The rest is pretty straightforward, just multiplying by the given numbers with no further unit conversions necessary.  </p>
<p>But you must get the volume in cubic meters first.  It&#8217;s a pretty large number, between 50,000 and 100,000 m^3 (assuming I calculated it correctly &#8230;)</p>
<p>Hope this helps a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

